• UNIT 2:THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF RWANDA AFTER THE GENOCIDE AGAINST THE TUTSI




    2.1.1. Establishments of the Government of National Unity
    The new government had to fill the power vacuum left by the defeated Interim 
    Government. In this regard, the constitution of June 10, 1991, the Arusha Peace 
    Agreement with all its protocols, the RPF declaration of July 17, 1994 and the 
    Agreement of November 24, 1994 between political parties were used by the 
    new Government in order to put in place its programme. 
    The Arusha Peace Agreement was the main source of inspiration for 
    governmental action. This was due to the fact that the Arusha Peace Agreement 
    included two important principles in the management of the state namely the 
    establishment of the rule of law and the power sharing arrangement. However, 
    the texts were adapted to the new situations. For instance, MRND and its 
    satellite political parties supporting the “Hutu power” and those involved in the 
    Genocide were excluded from new institutions of the Transitional Government. 
    Their posts had to be given to RPF. 
    A new army had to be created by integrating in the APR, the ex FAR and the 
    recruitment of those who had not participated in the Genocide. In addition, 
    independent people and soldiers were introduced in the Transitional Parliament 
    and a post of Vice President of the Republic carrying another portfolio was 
    allocated to RPF.
    On July 19, 1994, the government programme was presented by Mr. Faustin
    Twagiramungu. The latter was the Prime Minister designated by the Arusha 
    Peace Agreement. 
    The programme focused on the following points:
    Restoration of peace and security; Organization of central and local 
    administration, i.e.préfectures, communes, sectors and cells; Restoration and 
    consolidation of national unity; Settlement of refugees and returning their 
    property; Improvement of living conditions of the people and solving the social
    problems that resulted from war and Genocide; Revival of the country’s 
    economy; Consolidation of democracy.
    During the establishment of the transitional institutions in July 1994, only 
    Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF), Mouvement Democratique Republicain (MDR), 
    Parti Social Democratique (PSD), Parti Liberal (PL),Parti Democratique Chretien 
    (PDC), Parti Social Rwandais (PSR), Union Democratique Politique Rwanda 
    (UDPR) and Parti Democratique Islamique (PDI) were officially recognized. 
    Later, MDR was excluded from accepted political parties because of its divisive 
    ideology.A parliamentary report pointed out that some people wanted to use it 
    for their political agenda. 
    2.1.2. The achievements of the Government of National Unity on political level
    Safeguarding national security 
    After the Genocide against the Tutsi, the security in Rwanda was extremely 
    unstable as there were still unhealed wounds from the war. Most of the 
    population was displaced, creating a volatile situation in the country. Military 
    strategies were devised to find solution and eradicate the thousands of military 
    groups and ex-combatants who continued to torment and kill citizens. 
    The problem of insecurity especially on the western border of the country was 
    caused by the incursions of Ex-FAR and Interahamwe militias. To put an end to 
    this destabilisation, the Government of Rwanda proceeded to the repatriation of 
    refugees from Zaïre, current DRC and military operations aiming at weakening 
    the combatants.
    Politico-administrative reforms and fight against injustice 
    From its inception, the Government was supposed to set up administrative 
    structures from the top to the bottom. Due to lack of time to produce the 
    most appropriate administrative framework, it maintained the structure left 
    by the defeated regime namely central government, prefectures (provinces), 
    communes (Districts), sectors and cells.
    From 2001, Rwanda’s decentralization policy was an important innovation. 
    Its objective was to empower and invite the population to participate actively 
    in debates on issues that concerned it directly. It also aimed at encouraging 
    the electorate in the countryside to provide information and explain issues in 
    order to take decisions knowingly. The decentralization of activities went hand 

    in hand with the decentralization of financial, material and human resources. 
    The first phase (2001-2005) aimed at establishing democratic and community 
    development structures at the district level and was accompanied by a number 
    of legal, institutional and policy reforms, as well as democratic elections for 
    local leaders. However, the decentralisation process faced some challenges 
    because some leaders have to perform volunteer work. In addition, some of 
    them cumulated jobs and this could lead to their inefficiency.
    To reinforce good governance in Rwanda, anti-corruption and public 
    accountability institutions were created by the Government. Their operational 
    capacity continued to be strengthened to achieve greater accountability. 
    They include the Office of the Ombudsman, Office of the Auditor General for 
    State Finances, Rwanda Public Procurement Authority and Rwanda Revenue 
    Authority etc... 
    These institutions are mandated to fight injustice, corruption and abuse by 
    public officials and related offences in both public and private administration 
    and to promote the principles of good governance based on accountability and 
    transparency. 
    Rwanda has also signed and ratified the United Nations Convention Against 
    Corruption (UNCAC), the African Union anti-corruption Convention (AUCC) 
    and the UN convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC). 
    In order to promote consensual democracy, since 2000, free, transparent and 
    peaceful elections have been organised at local levels and Rwanda has put in 
    place a new constitution that clearly defines the main principles as well as 
    performance and limit of political institutions, multiparty system and respect 
    of everybody’s right.
    The 2003 Constitution accepts that almost important political positions in 
    the country must be shared by political parties and independent politicians. 
    This power sharing was observed not only in the government but also in the 
    Parliament made up of two chambers: the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. 
    These two chambers are complementary in nature, but independent of each 
    other. The Executive is overseen by parliament, according to the constitution, 
    while the judiciary power is also independent from the Executive and the 
    Legislative ones. 
    Promotion of unity and reconciliation
    The national unity implies the indivisibility of the Rwandan people. All citizens 
    should have an equal opportunity to national economic resources and can claim 
    the same political rights. Rapidly, the Government of National Unity fought and 
    eliminated all constraints of national unity such as “ethnicity” and regionalism. 
    For instance, “ethnic” labels were removed from identity cards. 
    In the same perspective, the Commission of Unity and Reconciliation urges 
    Rwandans to strive to heal one another’s physical and psychological wounds 
    while building future interpersonal trust based on truth telling, repentance 
    and forgiveness. Thus, the Commission educates and mobilises Rwandans on 
    matters related to national unity and reconciliation and undertakes research 
    in the matter of peace, unity and reconciliation to make proposals on measures 
    for eradicating divisions and for reinforcing unity. 
    In addition, a series of strategies such as solidarity camps where different 
    categories of people meet to discuss issues related to unity and reconciliation 
    and programmes on radios are used by the Commission. The Government of 
    National Unity repatriated a big number of refugees which was a fundamental 
    obligation and a bridge to peace, national unity and reconciliation. 
    In addition to the above efforts, the Government of National Unity introduced 
    several structures and programmes that were meant to correct past errors that 
    led to war and Genocide. These structures include the National Commission of 
    Human Rights, the Gacaca Jurisdictions, Commission Nationale de Lutte Contre 
    le Génocide (CNLG) and Rwanda Demobilisation Commission. 
    Besides to promote unity among Rwandans new national symbols namely 
    the national anthem, the national flag and the coat of arms were designed to 
    reflect the unity of Rwandans. However, “ethnic” based ideologies propagated 
    by electronic media or in families keep hindering national unity. 
    Remaking justice 
    The Genocide was carefully planned and executed to annihilate the Tutsi. The 
    Government made it among its highest priorities to apprehend and bring to 
    justice the perpetrators of the Genocide.
    Thousands of people were arrested and judged. Some of them were released 
    for lack of evidence and others convicted and sentenced. It is pertinent to the 
    people of Rwanda to feel that no reconciliation is possible without justice. 
    The big number of prisoners and cases due for trial placed severe strain on 
    Rwanda’s criminal justice system which had already been crippled by the 
    murder of professionals during the Genocide. The Government of National 
    Unity decided to ease pressure on the criminal justice system by categorising 
    Genocide suspects according to the crimes they were accused of. In this regard, 
    category 1 was composed of the planners and perpetrators of the Genocide. 
    A number of 2,133 people were convicted in the conventional courts. The 
    categories 2-4 where involvement was slightly less serious were convicted in 
    traditional jurisdictions or Gacaca courts. 
    This new process significantly sped up trials and sentencing, which if they had 
    been restricted to conventional courts would take over 200 years to complete. 
    The Gacaca courts also had the advantage of involving the community in the 
    trial and sentencing process. The Government believed that involving the 
    population in the trials could also contribute significantly to reconciliation. 
    In fact, testimonies from the general population helped survivors to discover 
    the corpses of the family members killed during the Genocide. Moreover, 
    some perpetrators demanded pardon from the survivors. In some places, 
    perpetrators and survivors were gathered in associations. On the debit side, the 
    Gacaca courts were criticised for corrupt judges and lack of lawyers commonly 
    used in modern judicial system. 
    The Government also made it a priority to strengthen the criminal justice 
    system. Special training was provided to magistrates and judges, while courts 
    around the country were renovated. A national police force was created and 
    charged with civil security matters and criminal investigations. 
    2.1.3 The achievements of the Government of Rwanda on social level 
    Assistance to the most vulnerable people 
    From the social point of view, the Government of National Unity faced with the 
    problem of assisting vulnerable people. 
    Almost all the Rwandan population that had survived Genocide and war was 
    described as vulnerable. With time, their numbers kept on reducing given the 
    situation which improved politically, socially and economically. The vulnerable 
    people included Rwandan refugees and repatriated displaced people, Genocide 
    survivors, single children and orphans, widows, people with disabilities, the 
    poor, HIV/AIDS victims and prisoners. Moreover, between November 1995 
    and February 1996, Rwanda hosted almost 37, 000 refugees including former 
    Burundi refugees and Kinyarwanda-speaking ones from Zaïre. In 2003, the 
    number of foreign refugees in Rwanda was estimated at 300, 000 persons. Only 
    35, 000 refugees remained in Rwanda at the end of 2003.
    The survivors of Genocide were part of the most important vulnerable groups 

    in the country. The Government handled them as a priority. In 1998, an 
    Assistance Fund for Genocide Survivors, - Fonds d’Assistance aux Rescapés 
    du Génocide (FARG) was set up. It was allocated 5% of the national budget. 
    This budget enabled FARG to solve a big part of its problems experienced by 
    vulnerable surviving children in the fields of primary, secondary and higher 
    education. The fund was also used to pay for health care. FARG also helped 
    vulnerable survivors to construct residential homes in regrouped villages 
    (imidugudu) and/or elsewhere. It was also used to repair their former 
    residences. FARG financed small projects to help survivors fight against poverty. 
    From 1994, the orphans and single-children received assistance of varied 
    nature. For some of them, houses were constructed; others were trained and 
    given supplies in reception centres. In this way, they received physical and 
    mental health-care, education and social integration facilities. Some of them 
    were able to reunite with members of their families. 
    The ministries which were dealing with social affairs performed the following 
    services: designing intervention programmes in favour of widows, providing 
    material assistance, conducting a census of raped and pregnant women, etc. 
    On the other hand, women victims of war and genocide set up associations 
    for mutual help. These actions produced tangible results. However, a big 
    number of them still suffered from the after-effects of war and genocide such 
    as traumatism. Among them we can state AVEGA AGAHOZO (Association des 

    Veuves du Genocide du mois d`Avril), BAMPOREREZE, DUHOZANYE, etc…

    Health promotion 
    Between 1994 and 2003, a particular focus was put on the improvement of 
    health infrastructure given the role that the latter plays in the improvement 
    of health. Some new hospitals were constructed, and old ones were constantly 
    rehabilitated or expanded. Several health centres were also constructed while 
    old ones were repaired gradually. In 1996 the majority of health facilities 
    started to provide both curative and preventive treatment. 
    National referral hospitals such as King Faisal Hospital, the Centre Hospitalier 
    de Kigali and the University Teaching Hospital of Butare were rehabilitated, 
    re-equipped and made operational. There were 25 district hospitals in the 
    country. Out of 279 health centres and dispensaries, 257 were reopened after 
    rehabilitating them with new equipment. 
    In 2000, Nyanza Hospital and Kimironko Health Centre were established. In 
    2001, there were 33 district hospitals and 40 health centres. The above district 

    hospitals were coordinated by 11 regional health officials.

    Health staff increased qualitatively and quantitatively. The National University 
    of Rwanda (NUR) Faculty of Medicine produced 1,999 general doctors. 
    Nonetheless, the Government resorted to foreign doctors from neighbouring 
    countries and even beyond to solve the problem of inadequate medical 
    personnel. Kigali Health Institute (KHI) also trained several medical assistants 
    at A1 level. The nursing section at secondary school also level produced nurses 
    of A2 level, whereas those in the social section trained and graduated social 
    workers. 
    The government policy of encouraging the people to participate in health 
    programmes was successful. The Rwandan Sickness Insurance Scheme,La 
    Rwandaise d’Assurance Maladie (RAMA) was established to ensure that 
    government civil servants get proper medical insurance coverage. It started 
    business in 2001. 
    Meritocracy and skills enhancement in education 
    The colonial and post-colonial administrations left Rwanda with one of the 
    lowest skilled populations in the sub-region. In addition to this, an “ethnic” 
    quota system for entry into secondary schools and the university made access 
    to education limited for sections of the population. 
    On entering office, the Government of National Unity immediately instituted 
    meritocracy in education system and measures were put in place to address 
    the country’s manpower incapacity. Since 1994, the number of higher learning 
    institutions kept increasing and were six in 2000. The total number of students 
    receiving higher education rose from 3,000 and was close to 7,000 in 2003. The 
    number of university graduates between 1963 and 1994 was 2,160. Between 
    1995 and 2000, a period of just five years, the Government of Rwanda produced 
    over 2,000 university graduates. 
    A former military college in the heart of Kigali was transformed into a modern 
    Institute of Science and Technology. The new Kigali Institute of Science and 
    Technology (KIST) was established in 1997 to provide technical, skill based 
    training to 2,500 full and part-time students. 
    The institute also hosted the African virtual University and conducted business 
    and entrepreneurship courses. Licenses and facilitation were granted to other 
    institutions and colleges to make more training opportunities available to the 
    population. 
    Similarly, from 1994 to 2000, the number of primary schools increased more 
    than one and a half times. The number of qualified teachers rose by 53% 

    between 1994 and 2000. More resources were made available to build new

    schools and to rehabilitate old ones. In addition, Government introduced 
    universal primary education, established education support institutions such 
    as the National Curriculum Development Centre, the General Inspectorate of 
    Education and Examinations Board.
    The National Examination Council was introduced to ensure fairness, 
    transparency and uniformity in standards
    Promotion of gender equality 
    Women had suffered due to war and the Genocide. One of the Government 
    and civil society priorities were to strengthen capacity building programmes 
    for women in all fields. In this regard, the Rwandan legislation which was 
    disadvantaging women was amended in order to give equal opportunities 
    to both men and women. The Government set up the National Commission 
    for Women’s Rights which played an important role in revising the law and 
    culture. Articles which disadvantaged women were removed. Similarly, women 
    organizations became very active. Hence, an association called PROFEMMES/
    Twese Hamwe trained women and empowered them to take up roles in decision 
    making organs, justice etc….
    In addition, laws on inheritance were reformulated. Furthermore, the gender 
    factor was integrated in all national policies on Rwanda’s long term development. 
    In political domain, the Government encouraged women to get involved in 
    decision making organs. This started from the first electoral campaigns of 1999, 
    2001 and 2003. For example, during the 2001 elections organized by district 
    and sector committees, almost 25% of the women were elected. 
    All categories of the Rwandan population took part in the process of drafting the 
    Rwandan constitution of 2003. This facilitated the inclusion of the gender factor 
    in the constitution. The 2003 Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda stipulates 
    that women shall occupy at least 30% of the decision making organs in the 
    country. The results of the 2003 elections showed that Rwanda was among the 
    first world countries with the most outstanding percentage of women in the 
    National Assembly.
    2.1.3 The achievements of the Government of Rwanda on economic 
    level

    Enhancing economic growth and development 
    Due to War and the Genocide, the country’s infrastructure was destroyed. 
    Between July 1994 and 2000, the Government of National Unity put in place 
    an emergency programme of reconstruction. In this regard, policies and 
    programmes of economic recovery and social welfare were put in place. For 
    instance, the Government designed first a programme of national reconciliation 
    and another one of rehabilitation and development. The latter was presented 
    during Geneva donors’ conference in January 1995. Its aims were the restoration 
    of the macro-economic framework of the country, capacity building, reinforcing 
    the participation of local investors and integration of refugees and displaced 
    people. In addition, the Government had to restore favourable conditions for 
    economic and social activities. 
    Almost 600 million US dollars was received by Rwanda for the period 1995-
    1996 thanks to the Geneva donors’ conference. The international financial 
    contribution served not only to rehabilitate and repair the basic infrastructures 
    but also to increase agricultural activities. It also improved Rwanda’s balance 
    of payments. During the second conference held in June 1996, Rwanda 
    received 500 million US dollars for the second recovery programme called 
    Rehabilitation and recovery programme (1995-1998). The third programme 
    presented to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) was a 
    structural adjustment. It intended to stabilise the country’s macro-economic 
    performance to improve the balance of payments, controlling inflation, etc. 
    In June 1998, IMF (International Monetary Fund) approved Rwanda’s 
    application to achieve Reinforced Structural Adjustment Facility. In 1999, this 
    3 years programme was transformed into a ‘Facility for Poverty Reduction and 
    Growth’ (FPRG). It was supported with funds worth 413.3 million USD. Thus, 
    Rwanda embarked on its economic and social construction. 
    Even if some programmes and policies were conceived, it was from 2000 that the 
    Government of Rwanda started formulating long term policies. They included 
    Vision 2020 and the Strategic Plan for the Reduction of poverty (EDPRS) which 
    was published in June 2000. These two strategic programmes demonstrated 
    remarkable dynamism because they inspired subsequent policies which were 
    designed in all government sectors. 
    The Government immediately set out to create fiscal stability and economic 
    growth. Inflation was brought down from 64% in 1994 to fewer than 5% from 
    1998 up to 2000. In 1994, annual fiscal revenues were zero while in 2002 they 
    stood at nearly 70 billion of Rwandan Francs (frw). The economy grew steadily 
    at an average of 11%, while gross domestic incomes grew at an average of 
    14.3% per annum since 1995.
    The process of privatisation of government enterprises started in 1996. Many 
    enterprises were put up for privatisation and shares were sold to local or foreign
    investors. The government made it a priority to diversify Rwanda’s economic 
    base. 
    The Government of National Unity was committed to rebuilding, expanding 
    and improving the infrastructure of the country in order to facilitate 
    economic growth. Since 2003 new roads have been built and others have been 
    reconstructed to improve the road system. 
    Other efforts related to promote health conditions in residential houses 
    increased the availability of water and electricity. Up to 2001, only 2.4% of the 
    homes were connected to water supplied by ELECTROGAZ as opposed to 38.1% 
    homesteads which got water from natural wells. The poorest people fetched 
    water from rivers. The average distance between homes and water sources was 
    703 meters in 2001. 
    As for electricity, the number of ELECTROGAZ customers increased. It rose from 
    2% of the population in 1994 to 6% in 2002. In addition, there was a significant 
    difference in living standards between rural and urban dwellers. 
    Agriculture and animal husbandry 
    Ever since it took over power in July 1994, the Government of National Unity 
    focused its attention on boosting agricultural production. It sensitised the 
    population to embark on agriculture as soon as peace and security were 
    achieved. It distributed seeds, basic tools, pesticides, etc. to boost agriculture. 
    To curb the problem of famine and guarantee food security, government priority 
    identified the cultivation of the following crops: maize, rice, sorghum, beans 
    and, irish potatoes. 
    Rwanda’s economy heavily depended on the export of coffee and tea. The 
    evolution of quantitative production of coffee from 1994 to 2003 was achieved 
    unevenly. The new export crops on which the Government focused its attention 
    included flowers which started fetching foreign exchange to the Rwandan 
    economy. In short, agricultural production increased from 1994. Between 1995 
    and 2005, it multiplied twofold. 
    In the field of animal husbandry, government action since 1994 was bent on the 
    following: increasing the reproduction of animals in all regions of the country, 
    reopening of veterinary laboratories and research institutions in animal 
    technology, provision of veterinary medicines and the sensitization of farmers 
    to ensure an increase in animal production. In 1994 and 2003, the number of 
    domestic animals increased by almost five. Quantitatively, animal husbandry 
    also improved because big-sized animals and the number of cross-breed 

    animals increased though generally, a lot of improvement was still needed.

    1. Describe the above picture. Explain what you think about the 
    above picture. How do you link it with the 1994 Genocide against 
    the Tutsi consequences? 
    2. Reading to analyse:
    “Since Rwanda’s social cohesion had fractured due to the divisive politics 
    that preceded the Genocide, suspicion and mistrust characterized 
    relationships between Rwandans. Thus, the new government inherited a
    a deeply scarred nation where trust within and between social groups had 
    been replaced by fear and betrayal”. 
    How do you link this text with the challenges faced by Rwandans after the 

    1994 Genocide against the Tutsi?

    2.2.1 Political challenges 
    Problems of insecurity 

    Although the RPF had captured the power and a transitional government had 
    been put in place, the security situation was still fluid, with former government 
    forces and Interahamwe militia still carrying out Genocide in various part of 
    the country. 
    A French buffer area in western Rwanda, known as Zone Turquoise had become 
    a safe haven for genocidal forces. In addition, infiltrators from refugee camps 
    across the border continued to cross and destabilise the country. The Rwandan 
    combatants and refugees located on the border of the current DRC became 
    a security threat which destabilised the hosting country and the interests of 
    several companies. Consequently, a campaign against Rwanda was organised 
    by the affected companies. It should be noted that the ex-FAR and Interahamwe 
    were allowed to keep their weapons and to join the civilian refugees. Other 
    sympathizers of the former regime continued to support combatants, notably 
    Zaïre (current DRC) under President Mobutu Sese Seko. All these proved to be 
    security challenges for a country that had been affected by one of the worst 
    human tragedies of the 20th century. 
    The Government of National Unity had to devise means to address insecurity 
    in the whole country so that Rwandans could begin the task of rebuilding the 
    nation. 
    Political and administrative vacuum 
    The Government of National Unity inherited a country without political 
    and administrative institutions, due to the chaos provoked by the Interim 
    Government. Most of civil servants were either killed or have left the country 
    and the political institutions were destroyed. In addition, during the period of 
    emergence, the Government faced the problems related to insufficient numbers 
    of civil servants, lack of equipment and motivation for civil servants because 
    they had neither salary nor accommodation, a judicial system that had come to 
    a standstill due to lack of adequate qualified personnel, cases of embezzlement 
    of public funds, districts without leadership (bourgmestres), and inexperienced 
    police force among others. 

    Suspicion and mistrust among the Rwandan population

    Since Rwanda’s social cohesion had fractured due to the divisive politics that 
    preceded the Genocide, suspicion and mistrust characterised relationships 
    between Rwandans. Thus, the new government inherited a deeply scarred 
    nation where trust within and between social groups had been replaced by fear 
    and betrayal. 
    This lack of trust between people posed a serious challenge to the functioning 
    of institutions because the vision of the Government of National Unity was not 
    shared by all stakeholders. In spite of all this, the Government of National Unity 
    believed that Rwanda was not dead but that it could be reborn and re-built.
    To reach that goal, the Government of National Unity advocated strongly for 
    unity and reconciliation despite the enormous challenges. 
    Broken judicial system 
    The Government of National Unity inherited a broken justice sector. More 
    than 140, 000 genocide suspects had been arrested yet there was insufficient 
    prison infrastructure to host them. Their detention became a huge challenge in 
    terms of feeding, and provision of medical and other services. In the same vein, 
    there was inadequate number of trained lawyers to handle the large number 
    of perpetrators of Genocide and this shortage of judges was also true for other 
    crimes that were being committed in the country. For example, according to 
    records of the Supreme Court, out of 702 judges in 2003, only 74 possessed a 
    bachelor’s degree in law. 
    Laws were also outdated, obscure and inadequate. For example, there was no 
    law on the planning and execution of Genocide. Nonetheless, justice had to be 
    delivered. Despite meagre resources that were available, the government had 
    to operate reforms and introduce new judicial institutions to deal with all these 
    challenges. 
    2.2.2. Social challenges 
    Lack of shelter for refugees and other vulnerable people

    The Government of National Unity strived to restore Rwanda as a country for all 
    Rwandans and provide a homeland for millions of Rwandan refugees. Tens of 
    thousands of internally displaced people, especially Genocide survivors whose 
    houses had been destroyed, were looking for housing facilities. About three 
    million Rwandan refugees taken as hostage by the defeated genocidal forces 
    in current DRC and some in Tanzania and Burundi were brought back home by 

    the Transitional Government.

    This humanitarian exercise was largely successful despite the failure of the 
    international community to address their plight in refugees’ camps. A big 
    number of older refugees (from 1959 and subsequent years) came back also in 
    their country. All these categories of the needy people were looking for houses. 
    A bleak health sector 
    In the health sector, the picture was equally bleak. This sector was weak in 
    Rwanda. The personnel in health services were few and poorly trained. This 
    was a result of chronically poor human resource development strategies that 
    characterised colonial and post-colonial Rwanda. On one hand, this situation 
    was greatly exacerbated by the Genocide in which several health personnel had 
    either participated in or had fled the country. On the other hand, some health 
    workers had been killed. Few refugees that had returned from exile settled in 
    Kigali. 
    The capital city attracted health personnel because it had some infrastructures 
    and was also safer to live in.
    To mitigate the health crisis, a number of NGOs and the army came in and tried 
    to make a difference, but the task was overwhelming since the number of the 
    injured and the patients was very high. Statistics indicate that immunisation 
    coverage for children had decreased as a result of war and mismanagement. 
    Malnutrition levels were also very high. Child as well as maternal mortality 
    rates were equally high due to poor health service delivery. 
    The prevalence of water-borne diseases and other conditions related to poor 
    sanitation was among the highest in Africa at that time. The high infection 
    rate of transmittable diseases, especially HIV and AIDS was equally high. This 
    pandemic disease had worsened during the Genocide because rape was used 
    as a war weapon. 
    The situation worsened due to a good number of traumatized people and high 
    fertility rate coupled with ignorance. Malaria was hyper endemic in some parts 
    of the country, especially in the eastern and southern provinces. 
    A selective education system 
    During the genocide against the Tutsi, most education infrastructure was 
    destroyed and the human capital almost decimated. 
    The education system was poor and did not respond to the socio-economic 
    needs of the country. Few educated Rwandans could not translate their 

    knowledge into productive activities to improve the standard of living of the

    Rwandan people. For instance, in the eastern part of the country, schools were 
    not only few and scattered, but in some areas they did not exist at all. Higher 
    education was not only quantitatively low but was also a privilege of the few 
    favoured by the quota system. For example, in the period between 1963 and 
    1994, only about 2000 Rwandans had completed tertiary education. 
    2.2.3 Economic challenges 
    The Rwandan economy and political situation before 1994 were marked 
    by economic stagnation and high levels of poverty, mainly attributed to lack 
    of vision and poor economic planning, mismanagement, embezzlement, 
    corruption by the leadership of the time. 
    As a result, post Genocide Rwanda faced a number of economic challenges 
    including an unstable macroeconomic environment. For example, in 1994, the 
    economy shrank by 50 % and inflation rose to 64 %. Between 1985 and 1994, 
    the GDP (Gross Domestic Production) growth rate was a mere 2.2% against a 
    population growth rate of 3.2%, meaning there was an annual decline of-1% of 
    per capita GDP. 
    These challenges were mainly due to the fact that the economy was characterised 
    by low productivity in all sectors, but most especially in agriculture.
    Yet more than 90% of the population depended for their livelihood on 
    agriculture. This situation resulted in a very weak export base coupled with a 
    narrow revenue collection. It implied internally generated resources or external 
    aid to fund social services like education and health. 
    In addition, there was low private investment. As a result, the country lacked 
    a serious and vibrant private sector to drive economic growth. In the public 
    sector too, there was a high unskilled labour force. For example, in 1994, at 
    least 79% of civil servants in the country had not done tertiary education. 
    To make matters worse, skilled professionals had been particularly either 
    targeted in the Genocide or had fled the country. In brief, the Government of 
    National Unity inherited an economy completely destroyed by the Genocide 
    and mismanagement over three decades. 
    Agriculture was the key economic sector for Rwanda because it employed more 
    than 90% of the population. However, despite this fact, its output continued to 

    be poor because the techniques of production were still rudimentary with the

    use of the hand-hoe as the primary tool, lack of or inadequate use of fertiliser, 
    poor training of farmers in terms of technological use and poor soils emanating 
    from over cultivation and overpopulation. 
    Rwanda’s agriculture suffered from structural and fluctuating problems. For 
    example, Rwanda’s soils depended entirely on rains because 1.64 % of this soil 
    was under irrigation and only 1.2% was cultivated. This showed that Rwanda’s 
    agriculture depended on unpredictable climatic changes. In addition, soil 
    erosion affected more than 20% of the national territory. A fraction of 
    the Rwandan population still suffered from food insecurity and malnutrition. 
    Price fluctuation of exported products was also another problem whenever the 
    agricultural prices fell. Although agricultural production increased from 1994, 
    food availability per capita per year was on the decline. 
    Farming and animal husbandry activities needed agricultural space. However, 
    the Rwandan soil suffered from demographic pressure and physical degradation. 
    It was overexploited because of high population density. Rwanda’s inheritance 
    system of family land transfers also led to land fragmentation. On average, 
    the size of owned cultivable land by a household was 0.72 ha, although there 
    were differences at regional level. Hence, land fertility reduced gradually. Soil 
    erosion affected a big portion of this land and anti-erosion techniques were 
    not yet widespread on the entire territory. Other behaviours contributed to 
    aggravate the soil situation. For example, overgrazing, bush burning practices, 
    irresponsible deforestation, un-reasonable exploitation of marshlands by brick 

    makers and the extraction of sand along valleys.

      

    Unit Summary
    Throughout the whole unit, emphasis has been put to achievements of Rwanda 
    government after Rwanda government after the 1994 genocide against the 
    Tutsi. . Attention has been given to challenges caused by genocide and genuine 
    solutions found to overcome the tragedy consequences. It has been highlighted 
    that measures taken rank the country in well and organized one world widely 
    and serve as a model in Africa. However, more initiatives needs to be achieved, 
    like it has been proved that the country lacked a serious and vibrant private 
    sector to drive economic growth. In the public sector too, there is still low level 
    skilled labour force to prompt the economic vibrant progresses to a higher level.

    UNIT 1: COMPARISON OF THE GENOCIDESUNIT 3:GENOCIDE IDEOLOGY AND GENOCIDE DENIAL IN RWANDA AND ABROAD