• UNIT 2: GENOCIDE PREVENTION

    Figure 2.1: Genocide never again

    Source:http://www.richardsrwanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/284884_2248833668160_1467762132_32478548_5366937_n.jpg


    Introduction

    This unit two covers the content about the genocide prevention. Mainly, it covers

    the following points: the concepts, factors and practices of genocide prevention,

    measures of preventing genocide, challenges faced during genocide prevention

    and some solutions proposed to those challenges.

    Generally, the prevention of genocide is done by taking into consideration all the

    factors likely to lead to genocide at the three levels namely primary, secondary, and

    tertiary. These levels refer to the period before the beginning of conflict that may

    lead to genocide, during the conflict, and during and after genocide.

    The genocide prevention is continuous and needs measures at every level because

    if it is done when the risk of occurrence of genocide is high, the risk of failure to avert

    its occurrence is also high. Nevertheless, genocide prevention encountered with

    many challenges, among them, certainty that the presence of factors at different

    phases may lead to genocide, and sovereignty of the state.

    Despite these challenges, many solutions can be taken at different levels. On

    international level, solutions like prevention of armed conflicts, protection of civilians

    in armed conflict, end impunity through judicial action in national and international

    courts have been adopted by the United Nations Organisation as measures of

    preventing the occurrence of genocide.

    Key unit competence: Explain measures of preventing genocide from happening

    again, in Rwanda and elsewhere.

    Learning outcomes

    At the end of this unit, I should be able to:

    •             Explain concepts, factors and practices related to genocide prevention.

     

    Introductory activity


    Figure 2.1: Copy of UN Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide.

    Source:https://www.humanrights.ch/en/standards/un-treaties/furtherconventions/genocide-convention/

    Since 1948 with the UN Convention on the prevention and punishment of the

    crime of genocide, different measures for its prevention have been adopted. In

    your opinion, is it possible that genocide can be prevented? Substantiate your

    answer.

    2.1 Concepts, factors and practices of genocide prevention

    2.1 Activity

    using internet or textbooks from your school library define the concept of

    genocide prevention and discuss the measures you can use to prevent it from

    happening.

    2.1.1 Concept of genocide prevention

    Prevention is a continuous process that aims at avoiding the occurrence of

    something harmful by tackling the causes of the harm prior to it and at each phase

    of the process to its occurrence and after. Genocide Prevention is any action that

    works toward averting a future genocide.

    Since the adoption of the Genocide Convention in 1948 until now, the response

    of the governments at the international community level to prevent genocides

    and mass killings have been very poor. These poor performances are testified by a

    number of tragic situations of genocide since the Holocaust.

    The tragedies in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur in Sudan have shocked the

    conscience of mankind, and there is a fear that the list may grow even longer in

    future, if prevention of genocide is not clarified and taken seriously.

    What is absurd is that, while for other tragedies it is generally not easy to foresee

    them before they happen and therefore difficult or even impossible to prevent

    them, genocide is preceded by factors and clear signs that it may or is about to

    happen. That would logically provide enough opportunities to take measures to

    prevent those factors from leading to genocide.

    Several years before the genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda occurred, there

    existed factors and signs that showed that a genocide could potentially break out

    but it was not prevented.

    2.1.2 Factors that may lead to genocide

    Genocide is not something that happens overnight because for genocide to

    happen there are a number of factors that precede and make it possible. They

    create conditions or opportunities for genocide to occur. Hence, one needs to first

    understand the process to genocide in order to know what to do, by whom, at which

    moment and by which means of preventing it.

    The prevention of genocide will not be successful, if the concerned people do not

    understand the process to genocide. Many factors have been discussed, but there is

    no consensus on a definitive list of signs or elements that are present in all genocides.

    The following are some of the factors that may lead to genocide:

    •             Differences in identity: Genocide is not possible where there is no difference

    among the population in a given state but this difference itself cannot lead to

    genocide if not combined with other factors ;

    •             Difficult life due to economic problems (poverty): Being poor itself does not

    make genocide possible but it certainly creates a favourable environment to

    other associated problems that may contribute to the process to genocide;

    •             Deprivation or inequalities in the allocation of resources: When this inequality

    is based on the differences in racial, ethnicity grounds, meaning, when some

    groups are given more privileges than others or when a group is totally

    excluded from accessing the resources, it may create tensions that may lead to

    other problems that may soon or later lead to genocide;

    •             Political problems: in many cases the origin of the genocide is the political

    dominance of one group over other groups. The dominant group may intend

    to eliminate other groups in order to have the guarantee of continuation of

    dominance. In reaction, the underprivileged group may feel discriminated and

    plan to get to power by any means. In both cases, they tend to use a war which

    might be itself another factor leading to genocide;

     

    •             Armed conflicts: the existence of armed actors has served as a motivation and

    excuse for human rights violations, including killings, arbitrary arrest and

    discrimination, committed against the civilian population that the armed

    actors claim to represent. Refugees from the persecuted side may also become

    warriors determined to overthrow the government in place in order to recover

    their rights (like having a home land);

    •             Human rights violations and impunity: genocide is always preceded by

    successive human rights violations and by impunity. In Rwanda, the culture

    of impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations based on ethnicity

    that characterized the colonial and post-colonial periods played a leading

    role in the genocide against the Tutsi that occurred in 1994. The episodes of

    unpunished massacres committed against the Tutsi “ethnic” group in 1959,

    1963-1964, 1973, 1990-1993, did not only pave the way to genocide against

    them, but also contributed to its magnitude in that it made the public

    participation high because of the then assurance that no prosecution would

    follow. The role of the elites and leaders in denying the enjoyment of human

    rights to some groups and in the impunity before and during armed conflicts

    is also an important factor.

    2.1.3 Practices leading to genocide

    During the process to genocide some special practices reinforce the divisions. Based

    on different studies, the practices are as follows:

    Social categorisation

    People are classified into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality:

    Germans and Jews, Hutu and Tutsi. In Rwanda, during the colonisation, researchers

    measured for instance the people’s height and the length of their noses. And then

    everyone was classified as Tutsi, Hutu or Twa.

    Identities cards were issued to each individual mentioning the ethnicity. It may not

    be deduced that this policy was meant to incite Hutu to commit genocide against

    the Tutsi, but this permanent line put between the groups and the implications

    related to that, contributed to the antagonism between the two groups that later,

    combined with other things, led to genocide.

    Figure 2.2: The stages of genocide

    Source: Inspired by the eight stages of genocide of G.H.Stanton.

    Discrimination

    The social categorisation which gives the basis for defining groups may be followed

    by the exclusion of some groups, intensified by the injustice in the allocation

    of resources as well as the injustice on how the participation in decision making

    process is distributed. Since these practices of discrimination against some targeted

    groups are either done by state leaders or supported by them, they grow and lead

    to other phases that may lead to genocide

    Dehumanisation

    Dehumanisation is a denial of the humanity of others and a step that permits killing

    with impunity. This genocidal ideology “dehumanises” members of a group and

    justifies violence against it. Victims are not considered as belonging to the same

    human race as the oppressors. The targeted group is often likened to a disease,

    microbes, cockroaches, infections or a cancer in the body. That is what explains why

    during the genocide, bodies of victims are often mutilated to express this denial

    of humanity. Dehumanisation is an important phase in the process that leads to

    genocide because ideologically, the perpetrators claim to purify the society as a

    justification. So, the ideology grows deeper to convincing one group that another

    deserves nothing but death and this is a legitimization to kill. The availability of the

    dehumanising ideology is important in the process to genocide but may not be

    enough to cause genocide if it is not followed by other actions.

    Propaganda for the elimination of targeted group

    For the dehumanisation to have its effect, it needs propaganda to spread out the

    hate ideology done either by leaders themselves, the authorised who are supported

    by them.

    This is an important phase in the whole process because it helps the elite members of

    the eliminating group to disseminate the dehumanising ideology and to bring other

    members of that group to believe in that hatred. This is an important motivating

    factor to take part actively in killings. A prominent example of the hate media in

    Rwanda during the 1990s is the famous Kangura newspaper as well as the Radio

    Television Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM).

    Preparation

    This phase is when some possible acts liable of making genocide are performed.

    They include writing lists of victims, creation and training of militia, purchase and

    distribution of arms to be used.

    Massacre of the target group members

    In many cases, genocide is always preceded by killings targeting a given group or

    individuals belonging to that group in different places.

    Genocide may also be preceded by killings of moderate people because, of not

    supporting the extermination of the targeted group.

    Extermination (genocide)

    This is the phase when the genocide is executed. It is when the intent to destroy the

    targeted group can be seen from what is happening on the ground. When killings

    are sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to kill like the

    Interahamwe in Rwanda during the Genocide.


    Figure 2.3: Victims abandoned during the Genocide

    In the case of the genocide against the Tutsi, the main actors were: the interim

    government local administration, security forces, militia, the media, civil society

    organizations (churches included), the population and the international community.

    Denial and impunity of genocide

    During and after every genocide, the perpetrators always find a way of denying their

    crime. They try to justify the killings, and to blame the victims, claiming that their

    own behaviours brought about the killings. In Rwanda, killers alleged that Tutsi were

    helping rebels of RPF, and they used this to justify the mass killing of innocent Tutsi.

    The denial of genocide is not only the destruction of the truth about the genocide

    by negating or minimising it, it is also a potential cause of its repetition.

     

    2.1 Application activities

    1. Define the concepts of genocide and genocide prevention.

    2. Account for any three factors that may lead to genocide.

    3. Explain any two practices that can lead to genocide.

     

    2.2 Levels of intervention in the process of genocide prevention

    2.2 Activity

    “When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world

    said, ‘Never again’. But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that ‘never

    again’ became ‘again and again’. The promise the United Nations made was broken,

    as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million

    people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined”

    Dr Gregory H. Stanton.

    By analysing this quotation, explain the different measures that can be taken in

    preventing genocide from happening again.

     

    2.2. 1. Prevention of genocide at primary level

    Genocide is not something that happens overnight or without warning. Genocide

    requires organization and constitutes in fact a deliberate strategy and one that has

    been mostly carried out by governments or groups controlling the state apparatus.

    Understanding the way genocide occurs and learning to recognise signs that could

    lead to genocide are important in making sure that such horrors do not happen

    again.

    Since genocide is a process, prevention of genocide would mean to tackle it at a

    very early stage. The prevention at the primary level consists of measures aiming

    at creating an environment that reduces the risk of its escalation. At this phase the

    aim is to put in place measures that may pre-empt the start of the harm. This means

    preventive measures that may avoid the occurrence of the harm by tackling its root

    causes. Prevention will therefore include the adoption of measures that not only

    prohibit the harm but also put in place mechanisms that ensure the prevention of

    that harm.

     

    On international level, the focus in upstream prevention is determining which

    countries are at the risk. This is mainly done using risk assessments which are quite

    accurate predictors. Numerous models have been developed, each looking at

    different factors such as differences in identity, difficult conditions due to economic

    problems, sharing of available resources, democracy and respect of human rights.

    Among other things to consider when assessing and addressing the risk of

    genocide is looking at structural and institutional frameworks in the country

    including domestic legislation, an independent judiciary and an effective police

    force to protect people.

    By using risk assessments (Early Warning System), policy makers, civil society

    organisations and  the UN must take appropriate measures to stop the situation

    from evolving into genocide.

    When the primary preventive measures are unsuccessful, then the need to take

    other measures may arise.

     

    2.2. 2.Prevention of genocide at secondary level

    Prevention of genocide at this secondary level is necessary in two situations. Firstly,

    in case a state has not adopted measures at the primary level and secondly, in case

    the measures adopted before did not prevent the risks of genocide from developing.

    The secondary prevention takes place when a genocide is already taking place. At

    this level, many genocidal actions are observed, such as hatred, intolerance, racism,

    ethnic cleansing, torture, sexual violence, disappearances, dehumanising and public

    discourse.

    The main focus is to end the genocide before it progresses further and claims more

    lives. Measures tailored to the situation are taken in order to prevent the risk from

    materialising or the situation from becoming worse.

    This level of prevention may involve military intervention of some sort, especially

    when it is in an armed conflict context. But there is a debate about the effectiveness

    of this military intervention whereby some claim that military intervention promotes

    rebel groups or that it is too expensive for the lives it saves. They prefer peaceful

    prevention because it saves lives and does not require costly intervention.

     

    2.2.3. Prevention of genocide at tertiary level

    When the measures at the secondary level fail or have never been taken and the

    mass killings start, measures at the tertiary level are needed in order to respond to

    this final phase of the genocide. Tertiary prevention focuses on avoiding Genocide in

    future by rebuilding, restoring the community and dealing with all the consequences

    to repair the damage caused.


     

    Figure 2.3: Cover page of Linda Melvern’s book

    Source: Mervern, L. (2004), A people betrayed. The role of the west in Rwanda’s

    Genocide. (cover page)

    Individuals and states have the responsibility in the prevention of genocide

    Important measures are needed to put an end to the harm. According to the

    international humanitarian law, the international community has the obligation to

    intervene once all signs are clear enough to prove that genocide is happening.

    Rwanda is an example of the failure of international community to intervene. In

    1994, with the presence of UN peace keepers, it was possible to stop the genocide

    against the Tutsi, but because of various politico-diplomatic reasons, these peace

    keepers were obliged to go back to their countries and let Tutsi die in the hands of

    the perpetrators.

    Tertiary prevention takes place during and after the genocide has ended. Its focus is

    on preventing genocide in the future, thus re-building and restoring the community.

    In other words, the tertiary prevention level also deals with all consequences in order

    not only to repair the damage but also to avoid the reoccurrence of the harm.

    In concluding, it is important to say that prevention is a continuous process which

    involves several actions at different levels which involve the individuals ,government,

    and international community.

     

    Application activities

    1. Explain the measures of preventing genocide at primary level.

    2. Analyse the measures of preventing genocide at secondary level.

    3. Using internet, research on the situation that prevails in Africa. Describe

    a case that you think may lead to genocide. Afterwards, point out

    strategies that you think can be used to prevent any possible acts of

    genocide.

    2.3 Challenges faced in the prevention of genocide

    2.3.1 Activity

    By making research on internet and using textbooks, discuss the challenges

    encountered in prevention of genocide.

    The first challenge is related to lack of certainty that the presence of factors at

    different phases may lead to genocide and the second is the uncertainty on whether

    the preventive measures to be taken can prevent it.

    Regarding the first challenge, it must be said that the certainty from the existing

    factors and risks at early phases that they will amount to genocide may be difficult to

    get, given the fact that the genocide is planned by those in power. Even at advanced

    phases, the degree of certainty of occurrence may still not be there. The process to

    genocide cannot be understood as an exact science. That is why it may be argued

    that the answer to the lack of certainty may be negative. Before taking preventive

    measures, one cannot wait until there is certainty that genocide will happen.

    In fact, by the time this is clear, it might be too late to prevent genocide from

    happening and too difficult to do it without causing other problems. The analogy

    with the prevention of environmental damage which does not require full scientific

    certainty can help to understand the uncertainty of the occurrence of genocide.

    The fact that there may not be a linear process to genocide that is identical

    everywhere is a big challenge.

     

    Another important challenge is that there is no institution that assesses the factors

    and phases in order to determine who takes which measures, when to take them,

    how and where to implement them.

    On the question whether certainty that preventive measures to be taken would

    totally prevent the occurrence of genocide is needed, the answer is negative as

    well. Given the nature of prevention and the process to genocide, it is very difficult

    for the preventer to be sure beforehand that the preventive measures to be taken

    will definitely prevent the occurrence of genocide. But, as said by the former UN

    Secretary - General Kofi Annan, “there can be no more important issue and no more

    binding obligation than the prevention of genocide.”

     

    2.3 Application activity

    Explain how identifying factors that may lead to genocide constitutes a challenge

    to genocide prevention.

    2.4 Solutions to the challenges faced in prevention of genocide

    Activity

     Having discussed challenges faced in prevention of genocide, propose your own

    solutions to those challenges.

     

    2.4.1 The role of the international community

    The poor record in preventing genocides forced the United Nations to conceptualize

    ways of deterring the crime while “recognizing and fully respecting the sovereignty

    of States.” The then UN Secretary - General Kofi Annan took important measures

    which inspired many programs in the field of genocide prevention. He identified a

    Five Point Action Plan to end genocide:

    •             Prevent armed conflict, which usually provides the context for genocide;

    •             Protect civilians in armed conflict, including the mandate for UN

     peacekeepers;

    •             End impunity through judicial action in both national and international courts;

    •             Gather military information and set up an early warning system;

    •             Take quick and decisive action along a continuum of steps, including military

    action.

    Figure 2.4: Rwandan soldiers in UN peace keeping mission in Darfur

    Source:https://www.trtworld.com/mea/south-sudan-agrees-to-more-un-troopsunder-pressure 179810

    Annan created the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide, later

    changed to the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

    (SAPG). The mandate of the SAPG is to:

    a. collect existing information, in particular from within the United

    Nations system, on massive and serious violations of human rights and

    international humanitarian law of ethnic and racial origin that, if not

    prevented or halted, might lead to genocide;

    b. act as a mechanism of early warning to the Secretary - General, and

    through him to the Security Council, by bringing to their attention

    potential situations that could result in genocide;

    c. make recommendations to the Security Council, through the Secretary

    General, on actions to prevent or halt genocide;

    d. liaise with the United Nations system on activities for the prevention of

    genocide and work to enhance the United Nations capacity to analyse

    and manage information relating to genocide or related crimes.

     

    With the introduction of Responsibility to protect people in 2001, the international

    community has taken significant steps towards greater awareness of escalating

    situations and employing a tempered preventive mechanism which views

    intervention as a last resort.

    According to this international norm signed by all member states of the UN, any

    nation has the right to intervene if a state fails to protect its citizens from genocide

    or other crimes. This means that state sovereignty can be violated for the protection

    of a population if the state is unable or unwilling to do it. This norm has enabled

    the international community to step in more easily for the prevention of genocide.

    However, there has been some question of the abuses of this norm as an excuse to

    intervene or create regime changes. Also there are still difficulties when intervention

    is discussed but it fails to give an answer to who should intervene and what are the

    constraints to such intervention.

     

    2.4.2 Regional level

    Various regional mechanisms have developed distinct methods for engaging with

    concerns that fall within the borders of their member states. The African Union (AU)

    is significantly more engaged in the region than its predecessor, the OAU.

    Through the Protocol Relating to the Establishment of the Peace and Security

    Council of the African Union (PSC), the African Standby Force (ASF) was established

    as part of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA). The Peace and Security

    Council Protocol (PSCP) covers a comprehensive agenda for peace and security.

    These include conflict prevention, early warning and preventive diplomacy, peacebuilding, intervention and humanitarian action, and disaster management. The

    other components of APSA set up by the PSC Protocol include the Continental Early

    Warning System; the Panel of the Wise; and the Peace Fund.

    The Eastern Africa Standby Force (EASF) created by the decision of the Summit of

    the African Union held in July 2004 in Addis Ababa, is a constituent organization of

    the ASF. Yet, a number of the regional organizations still lack the resources, logistical

    and communication capacities to effectively enforce the peace.

    2.4.3 National level

    Figure 2.5: CNLG logo

    Source: http://www.cnlg.gov.rw/home/

    All countries have not put in place measures related to genocide prevention. Only

    those who have experienced that tragedy seem to be aware more than others and

    Rwanda is in that case. In the aftermath of genocide, measures have been taken to

    face the immediate consequences and to prevent genocide from happening again.

    In the Constitution, the state of Rwanda (Constitution, chapter III, art.10) commits

    to upholding the following fundamental principles and ensuring their respect:

    1. Prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, fighting against

    denial and revisionism of genocide as well as eradication of genocide

    ideology and all its manifestations;

    2. Eradication of discrimination and divisionism based on ethnicity,

    region or on any other ground as well as promotion of national unity;

    3. Building a State governed by the rule of law, a pluralistic democratic

    Government, equality of all Rwandans and between men and women

    Laws punishing the crime of genocide and the genocide ideology have been

    elaborated. Special organ to monitor and implement these principles has been

    created, the National Commission for the Fight against Genocide established by Law

    Nº09/2007 of 16/02/2007. Its mission is “to prevent and fight against Genocide, its

    ideology and overcoming its consequences”.

     

    In addition, aftermath of Genocide, there is a need to put in place measures in order

    to prevent reoccurrence of genocide where it has already happened.

    One of them is keeping alive the memory of past acts of genocide. Genocide against

    Tutsi Memorials are extremely important in prevention of Genocide in Rwanda.

     

    Figure 2.6: Bisesero memorial sites and genocide commemoration are one of the ways to prevent genocide

    Therefore, it is imperative that the genocide against the Tutsi and all other acts of

    genocide elsewhere in the world be remembered. The second one is to educate

    people for sustainable peace and prevention of genocide using memorials.

    Then the prevention of genocide should be done in educational setting. The country

    of Rwanda has included the prevention of genocide and peace education as a cross

    cutting issue in the programmes that have to be taught at all levels of education

    from the primary to the tertiary

     

    Figure 2.7: Educating the youth through testimonies about the past is a good way to prevent

    genocide

    Other measures of prevention of genocide encompass effective arrest, trial and

    punishment of those who have committed genocide. The implementation of

    these measures requires the existence of the early and effective functioning of the

    International Criminal Court, the use of national courts with universal jurisdiction,

    and the creation of special international tribunals to prosecute perpetrators of

    genocide. That is why the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was

    set up in Arusha, Tanzania, began operating in 1995, after a UN Security Council

    resolution 955 of November 8, 1994.

     

    At national level, the country of Rwanda had put in place Gacaca court which is a

    traditional justice system based on telling truth, in the eradication of impunity that

    lead to genocide against Tutsi in 1994.

     

    Application activities

    Write a short essay (not more than 500 words) explaining two solutions to the

    challenges faced in prevention of genocide at each of the following levels:

    international, regional and national.

     

    End Unit Assessment

    ”We have learned important lessons. We know more keenly than ever that

    genocide is not a single event but a process that evolves over time, and requires

    planning and resources to carry out. As chilling as that sound, it also means that

    with adequate information, mobilisation, courage and political will, genocide can

    be prevented”

    Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

    at the New York launch of Kwibuka 20,

    the 20th commemoration of the genocide against the Tutsi

    Figure 2.8: UN Secretary - General Ban Ki-moon (2007-2016)

    Source: https: https://www.chinadialog.net/article/show/single/en/9523_

    champion_of _the _paris -Agreement-ban-ki- moon-steps-down-Do you agree or disagree with the above quotation of the UN General – Secretary Ban Ki-moon. Comment on your position.

    2. Evaluate three initiatives made by the Government of Rwanda to

    prevent the reoccurrence of genocide both at national and international

    levels.

    3. To what extent does lack of an institution in charge of assessing the

    factors that can lead to genocide be a challenge to the prevention of

    genocide?

    4. Read carefully the following extracts:

     

    Text 1:

    “The first thing I can tell them [other Rwandan children] I can explain that ethnic

    or skin color is not very important in this world. We must live together without

    discriminating against any person because we don’t choose what we are. That is

    why I preferred to forgive rather than revenging”!

     

    A genocide survivor

    Text 2:

    “We were walking with many other refugees near Ruyenzi, across the river from

    Kigali. The road was so crowded with people. I was with my grandmother. As I was

    walking, I heard a voice of a woman crying, and screaming from a child. I looked

    to the side and saw a lady with a baby. I asked my grandmother to stop, to go

    and see what is happening with the lady. But my grandmother didn’t want to go,

    saying, “If we go there, they will kill us.”

    And then I went down off the road alone, but other people continued on. The

    mother was lying on her side with the child lying on top of her. She was around

    one year, because she couldn’t walk. I was thinking, “Of course this mother will

    die, but at least I can rescue this child. I never had a sister. If I rescue her, she will

    be my sister.”

    My grandmother said, “Make sure that you don’t ask me for anything to help you.”

    I said, “I will take her; if I die, she will die. If she doesn’t die she will be my sister.” But

    my grandmother said, “You should not walk close to us, because we may be killed.

    Walk behind us, with a little distance between us and you.”

    I was very, very committed. We kept going; I was carrying the baby on my back up

    until we got to Zaire”.

    Source: Aegis Trust Archives

    Questions

    a. After reading text 2, if it was you, what would you have done when the

    grandmother prevented the young girl to go down off the road to see the

    child? Justify your position.

    b. By comparing text 1 and 2 explain how the measures taken by the

    main characters can help to prevent genocide from happening again in

    Rwanda. You can use direct quotes from the text.

    5. Do you agree that visit of genocide memorial has a role in genocide

    prevention? Justify your answer.

    6. Write an essay in no more than 300 words on the importance of genocide

    commemoration.

    7. Imagine a genocide memorial you can create in your home community.

    Describe what you can put in the memorial and explain how it can help to

    prevent further genocide.

     

    GLOSSARY


    Tackle: To make a determined effort to deal with a difficult problem or situation.

    Absurd: Completely ridiculous, not logical and sensible.

    Overnight: During or for the night, happening suddenly or quickly.

    Consensus: An opinion that all members of a given group agree with.

    Antagonism: A feeling of hatred and opposition. A strong natural dislike; antipathy.
    UNIT I: POST-COLONIAL RWANDA UNIT 3: FORMS OF SLAVE TRADE IN AFRICA